|Wednesday, 27. July 2017||You are not logged in... [Log In]|
The study shows clear advantages of the thermal treatment of waste by energy generation, heat extraction and steam use as well as lower uncertainties of inflation during the aftercare period. The comparison of the two methods shows further advantages for the thermal treatment of waste by the extension of the scenario period above 20 operating years.
The objective of the EU to minimise negative effects to the environment caused by waste disposal leads to stringent operational and technical requirements of waste disposal sites. The operational requirements include a minimum lasting aftercare period of 30 years whose significant expenditures have to be reserved during the operating period.
In addition to these requirements the member states shall set up a strategy which ensures that biodegradable municipal waste going to landfills will be reduced. As stated in Article 5 of the above-named directive biodegradable municipal waste going to landfills must be reduced to: 75% till 16th July 2006, 50% till 16th July 2009 and 35% till 16th July 2016 of the total amount (by weight) of the biodegradable municipal waste produced in 1995 or latest year before 1995 for which standardised EUROSTAT data is available.To achieve these targets waste management concepts have to be developed in many European countries to optimise collection, recycling and treatment of municipal waste. Therefore there is a demand of cost comparison studies, showing the long term costs of landfill compared to other waste treatment methods. CEWEP - Confederation of European Waste-to-Energy Plants e.V. ordered the following study - adapted to actual European conditions.
This report is based on the study “Total costs of ownership: Comparison Incineration Plant-Landfill ” ordered by the Bavarian State Ministry of Environment within the scope of the Technical Co-Operation Project Bavaria-Sao Paulo in February 2006.
In the study the landfill scenario is calculated rather conservative with an aftercare period lasting 40 years for literature shows aftercare periods up to 140 years . The method of Mechanical-Biological-Treatment plant is not evaluated.
The aim of the project is to develop a variable costs calculation for the total life cycle of the two alternatives after the “Total Costs of Ownership“ method. These alternatives are:
|Copyright:||© CEWEP - Confederation of European Waste-to-Energy Plants e.V.|
|Autor:||Dipl.-Ing.(TU) Werner P. Bauer|
Dipl.-Umwelting. (FH) Thomas Kroner
Dipl. Wirtschafts-Ing. (FH) Bernhard Lipowsky
|This article can be purchased via our partner ASK-EU.|
Renergia, a brand new Waste-to-Energy (WtE) facility opened in Canton Lucerne, shows that Waste-to-Energy can provide reliable heat for industries.Category: Incineration / Waste-to-Energy plant
In Slovenia arises one of the largest and most modern waste treatment plants in Europe.Category: Recycling / MBT
The final unit of the incineration plant is one of the most important parts as it has the objective of cleaning the air pollutants produced.Category: Incineration
The biogas produced from the waste can be converted in a CHP to electrical and thermal energy or fed as processed bio-methane into the natural gas grid or used as fuel (CNG).Category: Recycling / Fermentation
The Bio-Dry™ system is a static, aerated and flexibly enclosed reactor for the biological drying of various solid waste matters containing some biodegradable contents.Category: Recycling / MBT